| Our 1990 article reported on recent papers in the peer-reviewed literature and
two international symposia, one at the International Agency for Research on
Cancer (2) and the other at Harvard University (3), all concluding that
chrysotile fibers are less active than amphibole types (crocidolite, amosite,
tremolite) of asbestos in the causation of mesothelioma in man. In his summary
of the IARC meeting, Sir Richard Doll, an eminent epidemiologist, concluded
there is the difference between the effects of chrysotile and amphiboles, which
is so great in relation to mesothelioma that it is possible to argue that
chrysotile does not cause mesothelioma at all (2). This observation has been
supported by numerous peer-reviewed papers and working groups subsequently
(4-6). |
| Dr. Finkelstein also cited five cases of mesothelioma among former
Holmes workers. Three of the five workers died at less than fifty years
of age and all were less than sixty years old! |
| The analysis of 335 cases of mesothelioma observed at the Ramazzini
Foundation and the Bologna Institute of Oncology has
shown: 1) a high percentage of correlation of these tumours with
asbestos exposure; 2) a large number of population categories
potentially exposed to asbestos fibres and therefore at risk of
developing mesothelioma; and 3) the high risk of mesothelioma
among people exposed in various circumstances to asbestos used in
railroads and sugar refinery plants.
______________________________________________________
Med Lav 1997 Jul-Aug;88(4):316-20 |
| We reviewed the certificates of 39,650 deaths which occurred in the
period 1975-1988 in Leghorn and of 45,900 in La Spezia
(Italy) in the period 1958-1988. In total 262 cases have been
recorded as pleural mesothelioma. The main occupational
exposures occurred in the shipbuilding industry. Regarding
non-occupational exposures to asbestos, 13 cases of mesothelioma
were found in women who had washed the work clothes of their
relatives at home; we also found other domestic uses of
asbestos which were rarely or never discussed previously in the
literature: six cases might be explained by the installation of
fireproof or non-conductive materials in the domestic environment.
These exposures probably are more frequent than realized until now.
__________________________________________________________
Am J Ind Med 1992;21(4):577-85 |
| In stating that a threshold of effect has never been found for asbestos, Rall
stands behind the outdated one fiber can kill theory of carcinogenesis.
However, Rall fails to mention data supporting a threshold for chrysotile in
lung cancer (11, asbestosis (12), and mesothelioma (13) as well as a panel
report from the Health Effects Institute-Asbestos Research (HEI-AR) detailing
animal and in vitro dose-response studies exhibiting no-observed adverse effect
levels (NOAELs) for asbestos (14). Our recent work documents a dose-dependent
increase in asbestos-induced proto-oncogene activation in mesothelial cells with
no induction at lowest concentrations of fibers tested and an enhanced potency
of crocidolite asbestos in comparison to chrysotile (15). |
